SEO SEORANG lah SEORANG dong

seorang blogger, seorang seo, seorang indonesia

Author Archive

Dari berita yang di lansir detik :

” Komisaris Utama PT Sarijaya Permana Sekuritas, ditahan Bareskrim Mabes Polri sejak 24 Desember. Herman diduga menggelapkan dana nasabah hingga ratusan miliar rupiah. ”

sarijaya sekuritas

Trus kalo mengenai dah sering di ulas di sini.

Tapi emang Dunia Hedge Fund Sering berkaitan dengan SCAM activity…

” Wah itu kan cuman omongan seorangs.com…”

Anyway bantahan saya cuman satu. Apa sebagai fund manager kamu bisa menjamin kejujuran dalam “memakan” spread point dan entry timing dalam sebuah trading execution ?

All fund manager suka nyembunyiin “blackbox” dengan kelihaian mereka.

Yang jadi korban juga gitu. Mudah banget terkena “bluff”, uneducated investor.

Cuman di tunjukin simulasi, hypotetic gain dah pada mabok.

Ya kalau begini sapa yang di salahkan ???

Kayak nya investor mesti lebih hati hati. Bukan sekedar ngandelin tebelnya kantong.

Kalo yang Kalah cuman harta seorang sih gak terlalu masalah.

Apa direksi BUMN ndak ikut nanem duit perusahaan di sarijaya ?

Nah… Kalo dah gini yang rugi rakyat juga khan.

Jangan biarkan varian dari “ponzi” “” berkeliaran di bumi pertiwi ini.

So many story of the apocalypse. Not intended to scare you, but to explore why so many traditions invoke the end of the world facing in troubled times. One growing movement points precisely to the culmination of history as we know it on December 21, , or 12/21/12.

That is the last date on the Mayan long-count calendar we found and the precise day arrived at by one computer analysis of the I Ching. The theory has spread from new age circles to mainstream astronomers and media, and is even being debated in college courses.

On January 4, The History Channel airs Nostradamus: 2012, speculating on prophesies by the 16th century French apothecary. A feature film by The Day after Tomorrow director Roland Emmerich is due out next summer, and a new documentary called 2012: Science or Superstition? features the naysayers, as well as supporters who foretell not cataclysm, but the dawn of a new era of enlightened human consciousness.

John Major Jenkins is among those featured in the film. He is author of Maya Cosmogenesis among other books, and one of the leading voices of the theory. He’s known for fine-tuning the galactic alignment theory relating to 12/21/12. He explains that he doesn’t regard this as a horrific collapse of the world, though, but a time of transformation and renewal.

GUIDE, High risk of neurodegenerative disease aids, aid pills, fast, safe, healthy Sleep behavior pills solutions.

Click to continue reading “rem sleep behavior disorder true fact you need to know”

12-24-08

Manuel Uribe Dies

Posted by seorangs

dies.

Garza (born June 11, 1965) is a man from Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, and was one of the heaviest people in medical history. After reaching a peak weight of around 570 kg (1,257 lbs) and being unable to leave his bed since 2001, Uribe lost considerable weight with the help of doctors and nutritionists, and by following the Zone diet.

Uribe drew worldwide attention when he appeared on the Televisa television network in January 2006, but turned down offers for gastric surgery in Italy.

In March 2007, Uribe set a goal to lower his weight to 120 kg (265 lbs). Uribe has also been featured on “World’s Heaviest Man”, a television documentary about his bedridden life and attempts to lose weight.

By April 7, 2008, Uribe had reduced his weight to 369kg (814 pounds). His weight loss efforts continue.

Personal life
Manuel’s diet consists of 2,000 daily calories, with 6 meals (egg-white omelets, fresh salads, chicken fajitas and fish fillet in a bed of spring greens). Dr. Barry Sears who made the diet said: “Manuel’s ability to lose more than 400 pounds without resorting to weight loss surgery is a remarkable accomplishment.” He shed weight in past months, losing 52st.

Uribe, on October 3, 2008, gave diet advice to fellow Mexican, critically obese and bedridden José Luis Garza (about 990 pounds). A former chef at a bowling alley, Garza, who was unable to get out of his bed for 4 months, said: “Manuel inspires me with courage and the will to live. I understand that this is matter of life and death and that I have to follow the instructions that are given to me.” Uribe sent girlfriend Claudia Solís to Garza’s home with kiwis, grapefruit, pears, protein supplements, and promised to help Garza get a wheel-equipped iron bed. Garza died October 8, 2008.

Uribe has announced plans to launch the Foundation to educate Mexican people about nutrition, to combat obesity problems. He has asked Guinness World Records to certify in July 2008, his second title: “The world’s greatest loser of weight.”

Wedding
After a four years together, Uribe – who hasn’t left bed for 6 years, and weighing in at 800 pounds after shedding 592 pounds – on October 26, 2008, married Solís from his bed. He said: “I am proof you can find love in any circumstances. It’s all a question of faith. I have a wife and will form a new family and live a happy life.” He was transported to the civil wedding on his specially-reinforced four-poster bed, draped with cream and gold and adorned in bright sunflowers, on the back of a truck. Donning a white silk shirt with a sheet around his legs he waited to greet Solís as she walked down a flight of stairs wearing a strapless ivory dress and a tiara before 400 guests. Discovery Channel’s My Big Fat Mexican Wedding documentary will be the second TV show featuring Uribe.

Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Uribe_Garza

zone diet

Through more than a year of giant bailouts and bankruptcies, was one of the few big banks to emerge with its reputation largely intact.

, the global financial giant, did bet on subprime mortgages — and lost. But it nonetheless managed to maintain a robust market value compared with its diminished peers, lending it an aura of unrivaled durability.

So much so that during a recent parliamentary debate in Britain, where is based, an opposition politician scorned the government’s borrowing policies by asserting that Britain’s creditworthiness had fallen behind that of .

Now, as the bank faces a sharp slowdown in the emerging markets where it earns the bulk of its profit, many investors are questioning ’s ability to maintain this exalted standing.

Last week, shares listed in London sank more than 17 percent, hit by several analysts’ reports contending that the bank would be required to raise money or to cut its dividend sharply. On Monday, shares in Hong Kong fell 3.3 percent, after falling more than 9 percent late last week. In addition, there was the acknowledgment that might have lost the $1 billion it had invested with Bernard , the New York money manager who authorities say has confessed to running a $50 billion Ponzi scheme.

As banks throughout the world face uncertain futures amid the worst financial crisis since the Depression, — which spans the globe from its original home in Hong Kong to the Middle East, Latin America and North America — offered a vivid counterpoint.

Its share price outpaced the main indexes and still trades near its book value. Its assets are growing, with the $2.3 trillion on its books expected to grow by almost 20 percent this year.

Not only has the bank spurned government money, it has been — at least so far — one of the few financial institutions of size not to be required to raise .

But with the recent drop in its shares, ’s critics are raising questions about the bank’s globe-girdling strategy, particularly its insistence on sticking with its struggling consumer finance unit in the United States.

gets three-quarters of its profit from emerging markets, which have underpinned its recent success. But three-quarters of its loans are still exposed to the stricken markets of the United States and Britain, which some investors argue will hold it back, after the global economy recovers.

became the world’s top subprime lender when it bought Household International in the United States in 2003. According to Knight Vinke, a small asset manager in Monaco that owns less than 1 percent of the bank’s shares, the parent group has injected $60 billion into Finance — including the purchase price of $15 billion — in a so far fruitless bid to turn around this flagging business. According to its research, the money would be better deployed in faster-growing emerging markets.

A spokesman for disputed the figure, saying the total amount was about $20 billion.

Knight Vinke argues that should leave this business and focus on its core area of expertise in Asia.

“There are steps to be taken, but if all else fails, you may have to walk away from it,” said Glen Suarez, an executive at Knight Vinke.

“We see ’s comparative advantage being in developing its business in Asia,” he said. “We have always felt that subprime and Household International was a problem.”

In a report produced this year, Knight Vinke said that had been overly optimistic in assessing the risk of its subprime exposure and that if the bank were to take a write-down reflecting the full reality of its potential losses, it could total as much as $30 billion — a number that would require the company to raise cash.

declined to address Knight Vinke’s assertions publicly, saying the firm’s small investment position undermined its credibility.

Still, bank executives and board members have met with Knight Vinke as it pressed its position.

’s position is that its subprime loans, while substantial, are different from those of most other banks because they are not bundled into complex — and at this point nearly worthless — securities like those that forced Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and others to take large losses. As a result, management argues, is not obliged to write down these assets as long as they produce a cash flow.

The bank has also said that it is a global institution, with a need to be in markets from Shanghai to St. Louis, and that it considers the United States housing market to be a crucial part of its strategy. It also said that writing off its investment in Finance would do lasting damage to its reputation.

As its rivals took their lumps, maintained a healthy cushion against losses of about 8 percent, a conservative position compared with the greater leverage of other banks. But now that troubled institutions like Barclays, the Royal Bank of Scotland and Citigroup have raised large sums of equity to bolster their balance sheets and enjoy the explicit or implicit support of national governments, no longer looks so secure.

What is more, the advancing slowdown in ’s core emerging markets franchise is putting additional pressure on its earnings.

has said that its position was strong, but declined to comment on the recent reports predicting that it would seek a increase, which would dilute the value of existing shares. It has been careful to leave open the possibility of raising new funds in conjunction with a deal, or a major investment in a business.

For all the new questions, Julian Chillingworth, chief investment officer at Rathbones in London, said remained a refreshing contrast to an industry that seemed to lose its head in the housing bubble.

“It may well be that they have to raise , but there’s a much better chance for them to get support,” he said. “They didn’t commit the sins of others of relying on the wholesale markets, and they’ve been quite prudent.”

executives are by and large an austere, conservative lot, compared with their more expansive counterparts. Their attitude toward the banking excesses has been one of polite disdain as they turned down opportunity after opportunity to buy into the American investment banking market.

It is an approach that conveys a degree of rectitude not often seen in these days. The self-denying tone flowed from the top, conveyed by the bank’s former chairman, John Bond.

His successor, Stephen Green, spare and unobtrusive, carries on this tradition, serving as an ordained priest in the Church of England.

He is also the author of a book titled “Serving God? Serving Mammon?” that wrestles with the idea of being a man of faith in the City of London.

Still, the bank has not been immune to temptation — witness the $1 billion it is likely to have lost from extending loans to funds that invested with ’s firm.

There are signs, too, that the bank may be on the verge of some major decisions — particularly with regard to its troubled American business.

John Thornton, the former president of Goldman Sachs and a man known for his aggressive strategic thinking, joined the group board this month. He will also serve as nonexecutive chairman of North America — a position that will require him to work two days each week and will pay him $1.5 million a year.

It is not clear what, if any decision will be taken. Even with its recent troubles, the firm’s position is strong enough to support a midsize deal, especially for a bank with a strong position in the American Hispanic market, an area that has long been of interest for .

And analysts say that even cannot stay above the troubles around it.

“I’m surprised the shares have done so well in relative terms,” said Daniel Tabbush, an analyst at Crédit Lyonnais Securities, who wrote one of the reports that precipitated the stock sell-off.

“Now, we’re looking at the exposure to commercial U.K. real estate, the unsecured loan book, credit cards. Many banks around the world said they don’t have to raise , and then they do.”

source : IHT

Here we go... This blog use 2 languange, between bahasa indonesia and english. cara cari seorang profile | Seorang Engine Optimization Rank Affiliate Network Group Syndication Just feel free to enjoy the content and comment here. Seorang Blogger lagi hot di seorangs.com.